After claiming that he owned the phone and labeling his ex-wife’s actions criminal, he filed a complaint with the local police department. May was eventually arrested and, while released on a $200 bond, faced up to 93 days in jail for a misdemeanor larceny charge. “I was just being a mom, a concerned parent and disciplining my daughter,” said May. To make matters worse, right before her bench trial, an Ottawa County District Judge hit May with another charge: larceny by conversion. Larceny is simply the act of stealing property. But according to the Michigan based Davis Law Group, ‘larceny by conversion’ means committing larceny by “cheating someone out of their property or possessions.” The rub is that larceny by conversion is also punishable by up to 93 days, so May was now looking at 186 days behind bars. As it turns out, though, May’s husband didn’t own the phone at all ⏤ May’s daughter did. And seeing as she was a minor, the assistant prosecutor requested that the case be dismissed before any witnesses even took the stand. According to May’s court-appointed attorney, the case was “authorized on a probable-cause basis,” and should have been thrown out before it even got to court. Still, May feels vindicated. “I think it’s ridiculous,” May said. “I can’t believe I had to be put through it, that my daughter and family had to be put through it. I’m very surprised, but I’m very happy with the outcome.”
